GOVERNANCE
REVIEWS
There
is increasing research evidence that organizational performance is
affected by governance practices and key factors in the organizational
context, culture and dynamics. Boards in the private, public and voluntary
sectors are devoting increased attention to ensuring that their approach
to governance adds value to the organization and improves its overall
effectiveness
whether this is in search of private profits or
public good.
Synergy
Associates offer Boards of Directors of Non-Profit organizations,
Crown Agencies and private businesses the opportunity of an 'introspective
review' of their governance structures and practices. This consists
of three basic components that may be used individually or in combination:
- 'Governance
Self-Assessment Checklist'
- 'Key
Documents Review'
- 'Key
Informant Interviews'
'Governance
Self-Assessment Checklist'
The 'GSAC'
or 'Checklist' was developed to assist Boards and Chief Executive
Officers/Directors General in examining key aspects of governance
within their own organizations. These include such dimensions as Board
Structure, Board Responsibilities, Board Development and Management,
Decision-making Processes and Organizational Culture. A 'Checklist'
review would require board members and senior staff to complete the
Checklist (approximately 35 minutes).
Key Documents Review
This
consists of a review of 'Key Documents' such as Bylaws, Governance
Policies, Strategic or Business plans, and financial and operational
audits. We recommend that this be combined with either or both a 'Checklist'
review and/or 'Interviews' since organizations seldom work in practice
exactly as they appear on paper.
Key
Informant Interviews
'Interviews'
with a representative sample of board members, senior staff, workforce
representatives and other key stakeholders or shareholders. Informants
will be identified in consultation with the Board Chair and Chief
Executive Officer/Director General.
FULL
GOVERNANCE REVIEW
A 'Full
Governance Review' will examine the importance of factors such as
the relationship between the process for selecting your Board and
its responsibility to account to its stakeholders. It will consider
such factors as Governance Structure; Board Responsibilities; Financial
Circumstances; Governance and Management Practices; Organizational
Size and Developmental Stage; Clarity of Roles and Objectives; Adequacy
of Information, Performance Monitoring and Accountability Systems;
Transparency and Effectiveness of Decision-Making Processes; Leadership
Capacity; Organizational Effectiveness; and, Adaptability and Flexibility.
REPORTS
AND FOLLOW-UP CONSULTATIONS
The responses
are then analyzed and consolidated into an interpretative report with
recommendations. This highlights areas that respondents and our own
analysis have identified as particular strengths
or weaknesses
that require attention. A more comprehensive review process will,
of course, result in a more comprehensive report. A draft of the report
is offered to the Board Chair and CEO/DG prior to final editing to
ensure that it is validated by their own perceptions. Follow-up consultation
is available to assist in interpretation and implementation strategy.
BENEFITS
- Individual
board members and senior management reflect upon their knowledge
of important aspects of their organization's structures and practices
as well as their own 'value added' contributions.
- This
is a non-threatening, 'asset-based' self-reflective process that
will generate creative and constructive approaches to your enterprise.
- It
will aid your board in identifying strengths and weaknesses in important
dimensions of governance and organizational stewardship and in establishing
priorities for aspects that may require attention.
- You
will gain confidence in those things that work well in your organization
and know which may need a bit of your attention now and in the longer
term.
- This
process will stimulate and focus thoughtful discussion amongst board
members and their CEO/DG.
- This
is very much a self-evaluation process in which your organization
will be given an opportunity to see its own reflection in a 'Governance
Mirror'.
COSTS
Costs
will be negotiated with each organization on an individual basis and
will be sensitive to the resources of the organization as well as
to its size, complexity and a number of other factors.
A 'Full
Governance Review' is normally advised. However, partial reviews using
only one or two of the techniques may satisfy your immediate needs.
The cost will depend on the volume of material that must be reviewed,
the number of interviewees, travel time and other expenses.